scholar-evaluation
Category: research-writing · License: MIT · Version: 2.2 · Includes scripts
Tags: scholarly review, research assessment, developmental feedback, academic evaluation
When to use it
Provide qualitative-first, evidence-traceable developmental review of scholarly works and audit low-stakes research-assessment rubrics with optional local quality controls. Never use for ranking people or consequential decisions.Example requests
Ask your agent in plain language, for example:- “Can you give me developmental feedback on my draft protocol for a randomized trial of sleep hygiene in adolescents? I want criterion-by-criterion comments with evidence pointers, not a verdict.”
- “I’ve got rubric.json and evaluation_a.json / evaluation_b.json for our department’s internal seminar-paper feedback program (deidentified, low stakes). Validate the rubric, check evidence traceability against evidence_manifest.json, and compute inter-rater agreement between the two raters.”
- “We run a small internal feedback scheme for preprints and want to know if our scoring process is defensible. Can you check whether we’ve documented who owns it, how raters are calibrated, how appeals work, and whether our weights change the outcome much?”
Install
/plugin marketplace add KalarisLabs/research-agent-skills and install the whole research-writing category with /plugin install research-writing@research-agent-skills.